Article 370 LIVE: SC Decision on Abrogation Validity Soo
Today marks a significant moment in the legal landscape of India as the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, delivers its verdict on the abrogation of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir.
After four years since its implementation, the fate of this constitutional provision is at the forefront of national attention. Let's delve into the updates and insights surrounding this historic decision.
Security Measures Amidst Anticipation:
The entire nation is holding its breath as the Supreme Court prepares to announce its judgment. In Jammu and Kashmir, heightened tensions have prompted increased security measures.
The government has strategically placed magistrates in sensitive areas, and political figures, such as Mehbooba Mufti, have been put under house arrest to prevent potential law and order issues.
Historical Background of Article 370:
Article 370, granting special status to Jammu and Kashmir, was abrogated in 2019 with the implementation of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act. This decision led to the creation of two union territories, Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh.
Check out the Tweet here
The Constitution bench, consisting of CJI Chandrachud and other esteemed justices, has been meticulously examining the arguments presented by petitioners and the Central government over a span of 16 days.
The Central Government's Stand:
During the proceedings, the central government defended its decision, asserting that the abrogation of Article 370 was a constitutional prerogative.
The government proposed that Jammu and Kashmir's status as a Union Territory would be temporary, with statehood set to be reinstated soon. Ladakh, on the other hand, would remain a Union Territory.
Check out this tweet: here.
Political Reactions:
The political landscape is rife with opinions. While the opposition advocates for the reinstatement of Article 370, leaders like the BJP's Ravinder Raina emphasize the need to respect the Supreme Court's judgment without indulging in political posturing.
As the verdict looms, figures like Sunil Dimple and Amit Raina express their expectations, with the former stating that the decision will be written in golden letters.
Public Expectations:
The common sentiment among the people, as voiced by Congress leader Ravinder Sharma, is that they expect the Supreme Court to uphold the Constitution and reflect the sentiments of the public in its decision.
Legal Arguments:
The petitioners argue that Article 370 was intended to be temporary until the Constituent Assembly of the erstwhile state made a decision. They contend that Jammu and Kashmir has always maintained a unique relationship with the Union, emphasizing the need to preserve its autonomy through Article 370.
As the nation awaits the Supreme Court's judgment, the echoes of political opinions, legal arguments, and public expectations resonate in the air. The decision holds the power to shape the future of Jammu and Kashmir, and the nation watches with bated breath as history unfolds in the courtroom.
Click for more updates and the latest world news, along with Web stories updates. Also, get the latest news and top headlines from India and around the world at Speed News
